Volume XXII, 2010
Table of Contents
Metody budowy poj─Öcia zbioru w problemie interpretacji tez Hui Shi
Methods of building of set concept in interpretation problem of Hui ShiÔÇÖs thesis
Other articles by this author | Add to Quick Links
Source: Investigationes Linguisticae, Volume XXII, 2010, pp. 115-138
Category: Full Papers
The article presents an alternative conception of the problem of interpretation of the shortest and also most enigmatical text of Chinese philosophy, i.e. the ten theses of Hui Shi.
Le┼Ťniewski claimed that the source of RussellÔÇÖs dif-ficulties with antinomies is related to a lack of dis-tinction between a distributive and a collective class.
Mereology is the logic of a certain concrete whole constituted by the parthood relations of a collective class. The use of Le┼ŤniewskiÔÇÖs formal solutions in the analysis of thesis (8) of Shi Hui:
Linked rings can be disconnected,
shows that in Chinese philosophical discourse two kinds of set theory were applied: distributive and collective.
This is confirmed by thesis (5): When it is said that things greatly alike are different from things a lit-tle alike, this is what is called making little of agreements and differences; (when it is said that) all things are entirely alike or entirely different, this is what is called making much of agreements and differences.
Therefore the hypothesis seems plausible that the paradox of Hui ShiÔÇÖs theses was the result of a dual-istic formulation of the world order: on the one hand by the distributive order of distinguishing things by their names, on the other by the collective order of embracing all things within the frame of a common Universe.
| ||author||=||"S┼éawomir Sikora",|
"Metody budowy poj─Öcia zbioru w problemie interpretacji tez Hui Shi",
| ||journal||=||"Investigationes Linguisticae",|
| ||url||=||"http://inveling.amu.edu.pl/index.php?direct=251" }|